Monthly Archives: August 2007

The full text of Gustav Hasford’s half-legendary The Short Timers is available in its entirety online. You should go read it. In its own way, it’s a classic.

This is the book on which Stanley Kubrick’s (inferior, in my opinion) Full Metal Jacket was based. As you probably know if you’re at all familiar with the film, it’s a detailed, graphic description of what war and the culture of war do to the people closest to its prosecuting edge. Hasford is particularly strong on what happens to language under these conditions, the flat, banalized and roughly poetic stew of jargon, invective and malign power-words into which the spoken language deforms. I’ll admit to having taken a certain glee in this deformation in my time; it was one of my favorite things about being in the Army. For sure, no ripe habitué of the Deux Magots ever got any closer to an understanding of existentialism than that enshrined in the grunts’ compulsive observation: “There it is.”

You won’t find every last word of the snarling runs of genius-level humiliation you probably remember from the film’s Parris Island sequence – apparently a good deal of that was improvised on the spot by former DI R. Lee Ermey – but Short-Timers nonetheless captures perfectly the cadence and sense of the spoken language as it’s used by people who know perfectly well they’re little more than fungible components of a sprawling, indifferent war machine; in that, it’s kind of a companion piece to Michael Herr’s luminous Dispatches, which remains one of my all-time favorite books.

I don’t believe that people who have never been in combat can ever really wrap their heads around what it entails – and I haven’t, so it’s certainly possible that I’m talking out my ass here – but these books strike me as being about as close as most of us are ever going to get. I would hope that onlookers, and most especially those that claim to “support the troops,” would do the men and women actually involved the courtesy of trying to reckon with their experience (even at one remove, through reading works like these) before letting themselves discourse of surges and their “effectiveness” and so on. You wouldn’t think that’d be too much to ask, but recent history sadly suggests otherwise.

I really want to thank everyone for the palpable waves of support you sent me for yesterday’s duathlon, my first in something like fifteen years.

It was not, I must say, the prettiest race of my life. I finished like a grabasstic fatbody, well behind center-mass of the pack, but you’ve gotta know that didn’t even matter. Prospect Park is never lovelier than in the half-hour either side of dark, and that’s just when we raced; between the gentle evening air, the stridulant song of crickets through the long tunnel of trees, and the good loneliness of pushing the bike out the far end of the loop, it was nothing short of a peak experience.

True, I did come to regret racing a single-speed messenger bike, with its race-suboptimal gear ratio, against all the Spandexed folks on their three-kilo unobtanium-fiber dreammachines – I probably gave five minutes to that one choice, easy – but overall the evening was so much awsum. Much love to Chris Fahey for making this happen, the organizers for putting on a rather lo-fi, unpretentious sort of event…and of course and as always my Nurri, who showed up just before the starting horn with a garland of balloons, a camera, and a huge smile for those about to rock.

You know what? I could totally go for another.

Duathlon’s tonight. My 39-year-old ass’ll need all the love and support you’ve got to spare. : . )

So I’ve been inhaling Antony Beevor’s The Fall of Berlin 1945 for the last week. It’s a spectacularly weird blend, this one: half or more by weight an operational history of that last spring of the war – at the operational level, the protagonists tend to be things like this SS Heavy Panzer Division or that Guards Tank Army – leavened by significant, frequently first-person descriptions of the human toll.

This is, as you can imagine, eminently cheery stuff. (I blame Slavin, by the way, who first hipped me to the book, then fled immediately for Corsica.) Where the German civilian population was concerned, that toll was most severe, and in his detailed accounting for the depredations inflicted by the victorious Russians Beevor brings the reader to a place that I warrant most American students of World War II (and most particularly those of us who are Jewish) remain uncomfortable with: heartfelt compassion for the official enemy. I can’t imagine anyone reading about the fate of these ordinary Germans – even understanding and fully accepting that their silence and willed ignorance over the twelve years of the Reich was effective complicity in the worst atrocities of the war – and not having to wrestle with their own feelings of sorrow and horror.

Most prominently, this fate involved the Red Army’s practice of mass rape in the territories it liberated. Now, discussions of rape tend to be almost entirely excluded from historical considerations of war – this one or any other – for the usual variety of predictable reasons: it’s unpleasant to think and write about in detail, it besmirches the honor of the fighting men and units involved (!), it’s “distracting” (!!), or it simply doesn’t register as significant on the author’s radar. In this respect, The Fall of Berlin undeniably supplies a useful corrective to what I have to regard as a shameful and indefensible precedent.

Here’s the truth of what happened as the Red Army advanced toward Berlin, in a single stark sentence: “Nuns, young girls, old women, pregnant women and mothers who had just given birth were all raped without pity.” Navigating between the prudery and prurience that have marred other such accounts, Beevor enunciates just what it is that these attacks involved, and I can assure you that it does not make for comfortable reading; for many victims, suicide was the only conceivable response to the self- and soul-annihilating assault they experienced.

He further makes it clear that although not all Red Army soldiers were rapists (indeed, a number of victims were female soldiers of that same Army), the assaults involved were something close to a matter of official policy, and that in any event Red Army discipline, such as it was, was entirely inadequate to the demands of the situation. The regular Army were nothing short of cavalier in the face of the (female) enemy’s suffering (“‘That? Well, it certainly hasn’t done you any harm,’ said one [Russian] district commandant in Berlin to a group of women who had come to request protection from repeated attacks. ‘Our men are all healthy.’”) while the NKVD was infinitely more interested in rooting out soldiers who might have become exposed to non-approved viewpoints. (The latter, whatever their demonstrated feats of heroism in service to the nation, predictably enough wound up in the Gulag.)

You shouldn’t get the idea, however, that I’m entirely comfortable with everything Beevor has to say here. Oddly, and for whatever reasons of his own, at one point he feels it necessary to sketch out a kind of taxonomy of mass rape: as merely a single, not particularly remarkable component of a broader pattern of total revenge, constituting “understandable” payback for Stalingrad and other German atrocities on the Eastern Front; as a weapon of devastating psychological effectiveness in its own right; and, primarily where rear-echelon soldiers were concerned, an act of all-but-entirely sexual release after the “deprivations” of field life. The entire passage strikes me as invidious.

So the book’s not without faults, but I’d argue that its many strengths more than compensate. There is one final reason, though, that Fall is so uncomfortable to read, and it’s this: the book’s description of the cast of self-serving clowns, ideologues and incompetents that surrounded Hitler in the throes of his Führerdämmerung is impossible to read without hearing the resonances of the present moment. (Indeed, it’s cause for laughter of the very blackest sort to admit that, in the present straits, we don’t even have anyone with the indepence or integrity of a Heinz Guderian to push back against the groupthink lunacy. “You’ve done a heckuva job, Keitie.” Achtung Panzer! indeed.)

And so these are my thoughts as summer draws to a close. If you’ve got the stomach for it, do pick up the Beevor: I guarantee you’ll learn a thing or two, and maybe even find yourself in a place you didn’t expect. I know I’m the better – and, as usual, the sadder – for it.

Back in NYC. Huge congratulations to the now-married Liz and Mike K.; similarly outsize thanks to Teresa and Frank for putting us up in galactic calm, to Jennifer for practicing acupuncture with love, to Gem and Mike M. for squaring us away with some astounding preflight burgers…and as ever to neb for suturing it all together. MTK soonish.

Just confirmed that I’ll be speaking at DUX 2007 in Chicago during the first week of November, at a time TBD – I’m thinking this will be a “City Is Here For You To Use” talk.

That’s pretty cool, no? Man, not counting hubbing through ORD, I haven’t been to Chicago but one day of my life, and that in 1981. Maybe drove past on the Interstate once or twice. This needs rectification. Who’s got suggestions for Chicagoland things to do and see?

Call me sentimental, but I’m the kind of guy that believes that everyone – every single last soul – has a little über in ‘em somewhere.

You know what I mean, right? It’s-lashing-monsoon-rain, your-shoes-are-full-of-tidal-slush-but-Ride of the Valkyries-is-booming-in-your-skull-and-you’re-damn-well-going-to-knock-down-that-last-hundred-meters über. You’ve-been-up-for-two-days-putting-the-project-to-bed-but-you’re-hellbent-on-shutting-the-club-down über. She’s-never-looked-twice-at-you-but-there’s-not-a-chance-in-hell-you’re-leaving-work-tonight-without-getting-her-number über. Yeah, you know what I mean.

Everybody’s got their own personal flavor of über, of course. I’m no different. Trouble is, I haven’t seen mine for awhile. Too busy writing a book, building a practice, developing a curriculum, flying from hither to yon. It’s all rewarding, but it leaves precious little time to…to kick my own ass, I guess, is the best way to put it.

Today I woke up and decided on the spot that I’m tired of being soft, I’m tired of being overfed, and I’m tired of letting mi vida loca provide me with manifestly “reasonable” excuses for a sundered acquaintance with my own body. I used to be fairly hardcore, after my own pencil-neck fashion, but those days feel like they’re dwindling in the rearview even as we speak. This state of affairs, it hardly bears saying, is suddenly striking me as but-thoroughly UNSAT.

I took two concrete steps. On my buddy James’s recommendation, I went over to Crossfit NYC, thinking I’d see what they’re all about. Turns out that one of the partners in the studio is a great guy named Court Wing I knew like fifteen years ago, when I worked an espresso concession inside Seattle’s Scarecrow Video. In all honesty, I hadn’t thought about Court through all those years until last week, when I (somewhat uncannily, it now seems) wondered what he was up to, more or less out of nowhere. Crossfit bills itself as a “hostile workout environment” – between that and the oddball coincidence of running into Court, this is all the confirmation I need that I am in the right place. The über, yes, is strong here.

Three hours later, at Fahey’s behest, I registered for this Prospect Park duathlon. I used to do Bay to Breakers and Philadelphia Distance Run fairly regularly, to say nothing of all the running I was doing in the Army. But by now it’s been, oh, say eight years since I’ve run any kind of race at all. [How could I forget the 10K around the Imperial Palace I knocked down with Raye, summer of 2003?]

This should be good: I’m almost certainly an even match for anyone in my age group on the run, but bikewise I’ve got only the one speed to my name. And if competing on that basis doesn’t kickstart me into something resembling high gear, no pun intended, then something is truly amiss.

Oh, hell yeah. Even thinking about it feels great. So this is how one goes about getting one’s fugitive über back.

Realized the other day, with a bit of a start, that it’s been a year since I launched Speedbird – initially as an experiment in stealth blogging, maturing in time into my primary outlet on the Web.

What can I say? I’m for the most part delighted with WordPress, still tickled pink by my decision to go with a bog-standard, design-free default template, and gratified that most of you who made up the audience for v-2 seem to have found your way over here.

I still worry from time to time that what I post here kinda sucks – specifically, that it isn’t terribly interesting to anyone who doesn’t already know me pretty well, and that it all-too-often degenerates into lists of where and when I’m speaking – but that’s OK too. If this site has an organizing principle, it’s “dare to be suboptimal.” And as any former SAS man call tell you, Who Dares Wins.

I hope you’ve enjoyed the past year of Speedbird. I sure have.

You’ll have to get Dopplrized for the full and gory details, but the following is in rough schematic a manifest of the public appearances I’ll be making over the next month and a half or so:

- On the 12th of September, I’m speaking at a special free LIFT event at COEX in Seoul. I always have a great time in Seoul, and suspect this will prove to be no exception. Do come out and say hi, and we’ll go to Bongeunsa across the street afterward or something. (Better yet: it’s my secret plan to inveigle Laurent and Bruce and whoever else wants to come into coming with me to Harimgak, our favorite jimjilbang.)

- Airlines willing, I’ll be back in NYC in time to speak on a panel Mark Shepard’s putting together for this year’s Conflux, which is really going to be something special.

- The end of the month sees me in Amsterdam for PICNIC – I’ll be speaking on the morning of the 28th. How could early fall in Amsterdam not be a good thing?

- I’m back in NYC a good 48 hours before I depart for this year’s Ci’Num, the culmination of a three-year process, and the first one at which I’ll have books en français to offer. Again, my previous visits to Margaux have been delightful, and I’m sure the folks at AEC and la FING are whipping up something impressive for the grand finale.

There may be more – I’m still waiting to hear about one other significant speaking engagement this fall. Otherwise, I do hope and expect to see you at one or more of the above events.

I dunno, man, maybe it was the buildup: the last time I cracked a brand-spankin’-new William Gibson hardcover I was still living in Ebisu, and that feels like a long way back down the road now. (Come to think of it, I read that one in a single first-day sitting too.) But I’ll confess to feeling a little let down by Spook Country.

It’s not just the melancholy of knowing that most likely another five years (and a similarly dramatic interval of life circumstances?) will elapse before I do it again, which is a tristesse little short of post-coital. It likely has more to do with the fact that Spook Country’s Hollis Henry and Bobby Chombo never really resolve as characters for me – utterly unlike Pattern Recognition’s Cayce Pollard, a brilliant creation who leapt into highest definition in just a few deft strokes. (I continue to maintain that, with J.G. Ballard, Gibson is the finest crafter of sentences working in the English language.)

And in this, they’re of a mesh with the rest of the book. Four-and-some years it may have taken, but this is the first Gibson I’ve ever read that feels rushed. Not worked out in all its details. Strewn with great ideas that never really turn into anything. The trademark multi-threaded caper plot actually does resolve satisfactorily, even pleasingly, but it feels a little ex machina all the same.

Still worse, the book feels just as rushed on the physical level, sporting entirely too many missteps that should have been caught in the production process; it’s rife with copy-edit blunders, including at least one instance in which “Alejandro” slips past where the author clearly meant “Alberto,” and you do a clumsy little double-take that pulls you up out of the narrative. Too, the paper is insubstantial, the type sits faintly on the page.

None of this is to say that Gibson’s lost his eye for just the right shock-of-recognition detail that brings a passage slamming home – no, those are here in spades, so much so that it occasionally feels like he’s been shoulder-surfing the last few years of my life. The specific material objects – GSG9 boots! – and locations – The Standard, and still more so The New Yorker (!?!) – he chooses to limn his characters are almost uncannily resonant with my own experience, and the same can be said for his ear for subculture-specific and -definitive language.

And this is the real rub. The larger part of my beef with Spook Country is simply that the world he’s writing about has become too close to home for me. If a character in Pattern Recognition seemed modeled, in part, on Chris Cunningham, that’s OK, because I don’t know Chris Cunningham. But when you’re introduced to a character who bears a marked resemblance to Régine Debatty? That’s different. And when you consider it in the context of the flotsam of 100% dead-accurate cultural references that drift through the text, it’s nothing short of unsettling.

But here, of course, we depart from the realm of literary critique entirely. None of this counts against Spook Country as a work of art. If I confine myself to weighing the book solely on its merits: three and a half stars out of five, it’s nice to see Hubertus Bigend again, and too bad about all the oddly discordant VW product-placement.