Public objects

To follow up on a thought I Twittered t’other day, picking up on a comment of Dennis Crowley‘s: most public objects – and certainly all municipal objects – should offer APIs. (A concrete example: BART‘s provisions.)

Furthermore, specifically with regard to public infrastructures like transit systems, I believe that this should be a matter of explicit government policy.

What’s a public object? A sidewalk. A building facade. A parking meter. Any discrete object in the common spatial domain, intended for the use and enjoyment of the general public. Any artifact located in or bounding upon public rights-of-way. Any discrete object which is de facto shared by and accessible to the public, regardless of its ownership or original intention. How’s that for starters?

16 responses to “Public objects”

  1. Matt says :

    To paraphrase J. Jacobs… API’s on the street?

    See also Paul Hammond’s minimuni

    http://www.paulhammond.org/2008/12/minimuni/

  2. Paul Hammond says :

    Minimuni doesn’t use an API – it scrapes the data, which more than doubled the development time.

    As far as I can tell SF Muni don’t provide data publicly, although I assume they have a private data feed available to make things like Google Transit Directions possible.

    This disparity is a little frustrating…

  3. Michal Migurski says :

    Paul, 511.org does have a data source for schedules. It’s not an API – more of a giant datablob you have to sign a release to see. I’ll e-mail more details.

  4. Stefan Constantinescu says :

    The API versus the spitting out smarter data debate is one I can type out a whole essay on, but seeing as it’s almost 1 in the morning I just want to throw this out there:

    If everything was meant to be played with then the connections between the data would have to be controlled by someone smarter than the system, the user. If everything had said something about what it did, then algorithmically one can take all data from all sources and come to a new conclusion that people sitting in front of a development environment would have never otherwise seen.

  5. Joe Hughes says :

    If you’re interested in public transit data sharing and APIs, I definitely recommend checking out the Transit Developers list:

    http://groups.google.com/group/transit-developers

Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Infovore - 6 December 2008
  2. tomtaylor.co.uk - 8 December 2008
  3. Leapfroglog - 9 December 2008
  4. Public objects - 19 March 2009
  5. Design with Intent - 18 June 2009
  6. The Urban Vision Resource - 5 May 2010
  7. Urban Omnibus » Frameworks for Citizen Responsiveness: Towards a Read/Write Urbanism - 6 October 2010
  8. Quora - 26 February 2011
  9. YOUrban: Cognitive Cities: Public objects, living cities and data materials - 28 March 2011
  10. Caveat For Smart Cities — The Pop-Up City - 11 May 2011
  11. Mayo Nissen - 12 May 2014

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,289 other followers