Don’t get me wrong

What follows is something I’ve been meaning to post for awhile, ever since I realized it had become necessary. I would have thought this point was already quite sufficiently clear to all concerned, but since there’s apparently been some fairly significant confusion out there regarding my fundamental position on the things I discuss here:

Please do not make the mistake of believing I endorse or embrace technological interventions, whether in urban space or in everyday life, simply because I spend the lion’s share of my time talking, reading, thinking and writing about same.

I spend so much time considering these issues because I believe that both our experience of a given place, and the choices available to us in that place, are already heavily conditioned by the network weather. We needn’t wait for some maximalist vision of urban computing to come to pass: this is all true now, right now. What people are saying about you online, how they rate the businesses around you, which social networks their customers are using — these are the things which now tell.

You don’t have to like what this all implies. Most days I myself do not; I tend to think that there are very few ways you could augment, say, dinner with friends that would actually improve the experience. But if you care about cities and what people can do with them, you do need to understand these technologies and their potential.

The irritating guy with the popped collar standing next to you at the bar? He paid less for his G&T than you did, because he’s the Mayor of this place on Foursquare, and the management has cannily decreed Mayors get a 5% discount. Ten minutes from now, the place is going to fill up with his equally annoying buddies, absolutely ruining your hope of a quiet drink. And they’re going to show up not because he did so much as call them to tell them where he’d be, but because he’s got things set so his Foursquare account automatically posts to his Facebook page. Buddies of his that don’t even use Foursquare will come, to slouch at the bar, stab at their phones and try and figure out where the party’s going next.

You’ll settle up and leave, miffed, and ease on down the road a spell to a place you know where you can get a decent bowl of penne — nothing special, but good and hearty and cheap, and you’ll chase it with the big bouncy house red, and all will be well and right with the world. Except the Italian place is gone, gone because it racked up too many nasty reviews on Yelp, or somebody Googlebombed its listing, or its hundred healthcode violations made it positively radioactive on Everyblock.

Two years from now, these names will most likely be different. But the point will remain: if services like these are opaque to you, if you don’t know what they are and how they work, you’ll never have the foggiest clue why things shook out the way they did. Your evening will have a completely different shape and texture than what it would have prior to the advent of ubiquitous mobile Internet. You’ll have been tossed this way and that by the gusts and squalls of network weather.

Of course, you could just as easily argue that your evening out would be inflected in all sorts of delightful ways by the prevailing winds. Either way, though: inflected it will be.

And that’s why, as someone who enjoys all the things cities do for us, I’ve taken on the project of anticipating trends in technical development as they apply to urban experience. My aims are to challenge and contest visions of the networked city that seem to me to be designed in ignorance of everything we know about how cities (and people) work; to encourage literacy in the networked and other complex systems that now undergird so many urban interactions; and to instill in all of us a sense of our own agency in these matters.

Networked urbanism, read/write urbanism, open-source urbanism…sure, these things are in their infancy. But if the whole domain retains some plasticity, it’s also beginning to be shaped by parties motivated solely by their own interests, and absolutely not by any larger affinity for urban life and its benisons. To be blunt, I don’t want the IBMs and Ciscos and Microsofts of the world defining what networked urbanism can be for me…or, forgive my presumption, what it can be for you, either.

I still believe, as Howard Rheingold used to say, that “what it is…is up to us.” But only if we’re willing to get our hands dirty, challenge ourselves, and pursue insight even if it originates from outside our comfort zone. It’s what I’ve been trying to do myself, these last twelve years or so, and it would be particularly gratifying if you interpreted my efforts here in this light.

11 responses to “Don’t get me wrong”

  1. Marco Guardigli says :

    Our interfaces with reality are changing.

    We built tools for interacting with places
    and objects around us.
    It is just a new language for using and
    decoding reality.

    In the beginning we created languages
    for connecting and interacting. Now
    we build networks to move, decide, act
    and to rely on.

    It is difficult to judge if this is
    good or bad, but these changes are
    happening and we will have to accept
    the consequences.

    The inevitable lack of understanding and
    loss of control
    will gradually reduce the importance
    of our individual identities.

    Behavior will be determined more and more
    by social networked conventions.

    Life is beautiful.

    Marco (@mgua on twitter)

    .

    • AG says :

      The inevitable lack of understanding and loss of control will gradually reduce the importance of our individual identities…Behavior will be determined more and more by social networked conventions. Life is beautiful.

      That’s funny, because I heard somewhere that only dead fish go with the flow…

  2. Mushon says :

    Well articulated and emphasized point. This cautious tone can often go unnoticed as there is so much excitement and new possibilities these technologies bring into our urban life. Together with the 2.0 3.0 4.0… culture there’s an eager lust to always jump to the next thing, to celebrate novelty (even in the price of intimacy), to mark the networked territory by being the first to share (even in the price of our disappearing privacy).

    Adam, your inspiring work has become a symbol for the networked city. Often, the excitement it brings blinds our eyes to the more neuanced and often less exciting critique and warnings that you try to emphasize. I know it did that for me. I have possibly unjustly labled you with the enthusiasts as I was more receptive to your enthusiasm than to your critique.

    As our attention spans shorten and our tools become less sensitive to the complexities of human relationship (benefiting technological simplicity, immidiacy, publicity and profit) we need to be more careful about how networked words, actions and intentions are interpreted. We might be often misunderstood, and we most definitely too often misunderstand. It’s about extending our read/write media literacy.

    I know I often get these things wrong. For that I appologize (blogpost to follow)

  3. karl says :

    I hear you. There is often a quick tendency to associate one’s words with their hopes. Understanding doesn’t mean agreeing.

    Basically it is not because I talk about it, that I endorse it.

  4. Larry Irons says :

    I can’t help but think that at some point customers may in fact look for establishments that are not on Foursquare. Perhaps these places will place a Foursquare logo out front with a big crossed out zero on it.

Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. PKB - 4 May 2010
  2. Archinect - 9 May 2010
  3. Urban Informatics - 1 July 2010

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,067 other followers